Do we really have freedom of speech !!

  By Papiya mondal

• Verity perspective : It is important to know in detail about the issue of media integration and its impact on the diversity of information in a particular market. Critics of the merger raise the issue of whether the exclusive or oligopolistic control of the local media market can be fully accountable and reliable in the public interest. But Concentration of Media Ownership is the idea that most Media or Media companies are owned by a small number of Media groups or companies.

• Freedom of the press and editorial freedom: 

At the local end, journalists often see their stories edited without denial or acknowledgment. One example is the rejection of networks broadcasting from "ads" in favor of anti-war liberal groups such as Movon.org, or the United Church of Christ, like religious groups, regardless of the actual basis. Journalists and their reports may be directly sponsored by the parties who, as the subject matter of their journalism, are directed towards reports that are actually in favor of the sponsor, appearing, or simply repeating the views of the sponsors. 

As a result, if companies dominating a media market choose to suppress stories that do not represent their interests, the public suffers because they are not adequately aware of some of the important issues that could affect them.

• The concentration of media ownership creates a cyber environment where our content is highly filtered because big media wants to get more money out of the pockets of consumers. "Six media giants are responsible for 90% of our content, whether it's on television or through apps and services on our cell phones," the statement said. This cyber environment creates a lot of recognition and repetition of material recycling across different groups of society, resulting in the general public being influenced by absurdity and thus building a personality that is similar to the average person due to extreme media exposure. Mass has been around for more than a decade now. I don't think we should have rules that limit media ownership, although I believe we should have rules that don't allow content restriction. If we have rules to overcome these limitations, then net neutrality will be a success in the sense that the average person or family will have easier access to their favorite content without being hampered by unfair fees due to the elimination of net neutrality; Which I hope will not become a reality. In my opinion, the rule of limiting media ownership would be a direct threat to our free enterprise / market economy system. I believe that it would be unfair to restrict horizontal or vertical integration by aggregates, just as it would be unfair for aggregates to restrict the kind of content that the general public may have access to.